You don't control the machine
The hardware, price and terms belong to the provider, and change without your permission.
Centram · Developer preview
Where it runs. What it learns. What it shares — keep those choices in your hands.
Live readout · genome_merge._slerp
Scrub t to explore the merge operator. These numbers describe interpolation, not measured learning.
WebGL unavailable — the readout is still live.
Developer preview · source build only · no two-machine test yet
The one section below without a marker makes no claim about Centram.
First launch creates a local node identity and API token. Downloading a model is a separate step. Installation is in the docs, which are not published yet →
The current deal
Much of today's AI runs in someone else's cloud. Your data — and the improvements you help create — stay behind the API.
The hardware, price and terms belong to the provider, and change without your permission.
Personalisation usually means sending documents, messages and habits to someone else's server.
Every correction improves a model behind the API.
Own the process
implementedThat add-on is a LoRA: a small set of extra weights beside a model you never retrain. Raw data never leaves; what is shared is perturbed with statistical noise by default.
a per-day privacy budget is applied by default
measured: privacy and collaboration do not yet coexist — with the privacy budget on, the receiving gate takes almost nothing.
What a machine learns becomes a compact update file — a genome. The receiver puts it through a staged gate: trust, rate limit, evaluation budget, replay, hop-chain integrity, structural and statistical checks.
accept only if the merged model measures better than the one it replaces
every exchange so far has run between processes on a single host.
The prototype divides a model's layers into shards held by separate processes.
TinyLlama-1.1B 22 layers, split across two shards · tokens identical · 4.13× slower
SmolLM-135M 30 layers, split across two shards · tokens identical · 1.58× slower
both shards were subprocesses on one laptop. No cross-machine test has been done.
Proof, not promises measured
Splitting one model's layers across separate processes reproduces the single-process output token for token, on both models tested. A peer's update measurably improves another peer's model on the same task.
The claim this project exists to prove — that merging what different machines learned beats the best single specialist — is not proven. It has been measured and it did not hold. That is stated here rather than left out, and the detail behind it is held back with the rest of the research until release.
What Centram OS is
designedA design for letting that intelligence use an ordinary operating system safely — through Core's permissions, Module capability, and River's evidence. It is neither an AI chat app nor a bespoke kernel.
Files, web, mail, photos, settings. An icon resolves through the public intent path, and behind it memory, permission and execution evidence accumulate as one trail.
External services get used. The boundary for memory, deletion, recovery and permission still sits with you.
Model output is not authority. Every read, send or change is re-checked against the granted capability, and the stated purpose is recorded.
Philosophy
designedThe memory, output and capability produced in contexts you permitted should be yours to inspect, correct, delete, take with you, and license on your own terms. That is a commitment about what a system owes you, not a claim that you legally own all information.
Future of work
unprovenWhat is demonstrated today is the floor beneath that: a local fine-tuner that cannot make your model worse. The compounding described here depends on pooled learning beating the best single specialist, and the one committed five-seed test at 1.1B went the other way.
Existing AI services
Centram OS, as designed
Modules
designedA Module is a specialist capability. In time Personal Intelligence will choose them, but the right to read, write, send or act is confirmed by Core every time.
Searches your memory within the owner's scope.
Summarises text you paste, through the local model broker. Pasted text, not documents.
Keeps the glossary and the context, and translates only the range you name.
Reads a repository and returns proposed changes, tests, diffs and an explanation. It proposes; it does not apply.
Would turn pages and images into searchable text with provenance attached.
Would propose constrained routes from your schedule, maps and device signals.
Would turn sensor input into safe candidate actions.
Would exchange permitted evidence of improvement without collecting raw data.
Webπ / River
designedWebπ is not an existing standard; it is Centram's idea of what a network should be. River carries local events and security evidence as typed data, tagged with the authorising grant id. It never issues authority — Core checks again at use time.
shared streams are disabled today. River stays on the device, so nothing circulates yet.
Trust by design
designedCentram OS starts from the assumption that AI must not take choices away from people. The permission surface that would carry it is specified and partly built: the daemon refuses what it cannot verify.
the consent dialog is still in progress.
Concept screen · not a shipping dialog
Allowing this does not send any photo anywhere.
Honest status measured
A node runs, speaks to other nodes on a local network, and serves a local API. Distributed inference and peer-to-peer transfer have been measured and work. Everything above those two results is design: it is written down, much of it is implemented, and none of it has been run as a real network across separate machines.
The central research claim has not been proven. The full ledger — every item, every number, and the files behind them — is held back with the research until release.